US shifts approach to global HIV and malaria programs amid expert concerns
The US is transitioning from centralized global health programs to individual country partnerships, raising concerns about monitoring effectiveness.

The United States government released what is expected to be the final report from PEPFAR (President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) earlier this month, marking a significant shift in how the country approaches global health initiatives. The program's chief science officer announced his resignation shortly after the report's release.
The U.S. is moving away from centralized programs like PEPFAR toward a system of individual partnerships with countries, according to health policy experts. This transition affects both HIV prevention efforts and malaria programs, with the President's Malaria Initiative having previously saved millions of lives and prevented billions of malaria cases.
Public health experts have expressed concern about the pace of this transition, particularly regarding the government's ability to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of these new partnership arrangements. They worry that moving too quickly could undermine more than two decades of progress achieved through coordinated programs like PEPFAR.
The shift comes at a critical time when experts believe the end of the HIV epidemic may be achievable. However, they note concerning trends, including a decline in infant HIV testing rates. Some experts suggest the new approach may be influenced by resource extraction considerations rather than purely health-focused objectives.
While increased leadership and ownership by partner countries has long been a goal of global health initiatives, the transition raises questions about maintaining the momentum of successful programs. The change represents a fundamental shift in how the United States engages in global health diplomacy and disease prevention efforts.