Vice President Kamala Harris has publicly endorsed the idea of expanding the Supreme Court, reviving a contentious proposal that has divided Democrats and drawn comparisons to Franklin D. Roosevelt's unsuccessful 1937 court reform attempt.

The proposal to add justices to the nine-member Supreme Court has gained traction among some progressive Democrats who argue the current conservative majority undermines key policy priorities. Roosevelt's similar effort in 1937 faced opposition from members of his own party and was ultimately unsuccessful.

Meanwhile, House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin has criticized potential settlement discussions between former President Trump and the Internal Revenue Service. Raskin described any such arrangement as resembling a "political slush fund" and questioned its constitutionality.

The Supreme Court expansion debate reflects broader Democratic concerns about the judiciary following recent conservative rulings on issues including abortion rights, environmental regulations, and federal agency authority. The court currently has a 6-3 conservative majority.

Both issues highlight ongoing tensions between Democrats and the judicial system, as party leaders seek ways to counter what they view as unfavorable court decisions. The proposals face significant political and procedural hurdles, requiring substantial congressional support that currently appears unlikely.